Todd Bertuzzi of the Vancouver Canucks was just handed a suspension which
has the potential to be the longest one the National Hockey League has
ever issued. He was suspended for the balance of the regular season (13
games) and the entire playoffs (anywhere from 4 games to 28 games depending
on the performance of the Canucks). And it may not end there. At
the beginning of training camp Bertuzzi will have to apply for reinstatement
to Commissioner Gary Bettman, who may or may not extend the suspension.
Even assuming that he is reinstated right away, that's still a potential
of 41 games.
You may ask "What did Bertuzzi do to deserve such a harsh penalty?"
The popular interpretation of events goes something like this: Bertuzzi
was mad at Colorado Avalanche player Steven Moore for a cheap shot elbow
delivered to Vancouver Canuck captain Markus Naslund a couple of weeks
earlier, which caused Naslund to miss 3 games. He wanted to get even.
He stalked Moore for 15 seconds before sucker punching him in the head
and driving his face into the ice, knocking him unconscious and breaking
his neck in the process.
This has many people calling for Bertuzzi's head on a silver platter.
Well, maybe not, but there are many fans and reporters alike arguing that
Bertuzzi should never play in the NHL again. However there is a lot more
to this story than what is written above.
First, I want to address the issue of Bertuzzi intentionally driving
Moore's head into the ice. I don't think this is true. From what I see,
Moore was knocked out by the punch, collapsing without Bertuzzi's help.
Momentum, and the fact that Bertuzzi was holding Moore's jersey, brought
him down on top of him. Not to mention the fact that immediately afterwards,
Andrei Nikolishin of Colorado leaped onto the pile. I'm sure that didn't
make things any better.
Secondly, let's look at the "stalking." Bertuzzi followed Moore
around, tugging at his jersey. Moore knew darn well that he was there.
Bertuzzi would have been trying to get Moore to drop the gloves. When
Moore kept ignoring him, not wanting to fight, Bertuzzi got frustrated,
hauled off, and punched him.
This is not the first time we've seen a sucker punch. Others have resulted
in suspensions. In 1999, Tie Domi received an eight game suspension for
sucker punching Ulf Samuelsson, which knocked him out and gave him a concussion.
Now I've never liked Samuelsson after what he did to Cam Neely, but still
— eight games. In 1998, Matt Johnson received a 12 game suspension
for punching Jeff Beukeboom in the back of the head in a retaliatory move,
giving him a concussion and ending his career. In looking at these examples,
a 13 game suspension for Bertuzzi is reasonable. That covers the rest
of the regular season, but not the playoffs. But he was suspended for
the playoffs. Since Bertuzzi is one of the best players in the league,
this will end up hurting the Canucks and the fans more than anybody. Their
chances of doing well in the playoffs have taken a major blow.
To put things in perspective, the previous longest suspension in league
history was given to Marty McSorley in 2000. McSorley swung his stick
and smacked Donald Brashear (also of the Canucks) in the head with it.
It was arguably the most brutal attack the league had even seen. For that
McSorley got 23 games. Bertuzzi is facing more. So punching a guy in the
face earns you a longer suspension than swinging your stick and hitting
someone in the head. Apparently that makes sense to Colin Campbell (NHL
VP), but not to me. Also, you can look at a guy like Bryan Marchment.
This guy is, as Greg Sansone from The Score so eloquently put
it, "the poster boy for repeat offenders." He is the cheapest
of the cheap for running players from behind and kneeing. But he's never
gotten a suspension close to this.
It's obvious that the league is looking to make an example of Bertuzzi.
They foolishly believe that if they give one of their star players a suspension
longer than any other in the history of the game that players will stop
retaliating and dispensing "frontier justice," to use the popular
expression for this type of behaviour. Well the NHL should stop pointing
all the fingers at the players and start point them at itself. I'm taking
this back to the referees. When Moore hit Naslund, he didn't even receive
a minor penalty. He could have been called for several things, like elbowing
or interference. But he wasn't called for anything. After that game, Bertuzzi
said, "I think that's a joke. It's unfortunate the game was where
it was at because it would have been a different situation for sure. .
. That's for the refs to police and they didn't do it." I dare say
that if one of the two referees had called even a minor penalty on Moore,
none of this would have ever happened.
Why is it that two referees do a worse job officiating a game than one?
The two-referee system was supposed to be a solution to these types of
missed calls, but instead things have gotten worse. That leaves it up
to the players to settle things on their own, which is not right. Bettman
needs to make sure that his officials actually make calls. If the players
are getting penalized for their infractions, other players won't go after
them with cheap shots.
Was Bertuzzi right to do what he did? Of course not. There's no place
for that kind of thing in hockey. He deserves being suspended for the
rest of the regular season. No more. No less. I feel it's unfair to make
this kind of example out of Todd Bertuzzi. The league needs to examine
itself as opposed to dishing out suspension after suspension. How about
calling penalties instead?
|